<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>frequency on Dimitris Kokoretsis</title>
    
    
    
    <link>https://dimitris.netlify.app/tags/frequency/</link>
    <description>Recent content in frequency on Dimitris Kokoretsis</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="https://dimitris.netlify.app/tags/frequency/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Drawing random biscuits: from probability to data</title>
      <link>https://dimitris.netlify.app/posts/random-biscuits/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://dimitris.netlify.app/posts/random-biscuits/</guid>
      <description>
        
          &lt;img src=&#34;https://dimitris.netlify.app/posts/random-biscuits/thumbnail.png&#34;/&gt;
          
        
        
        
          I stumbled upon a probability exercise when I had just built enough confidence with R scripting, and I was looking for &amp;ldquo;toy problems&amp;rdquo; to play with. It was a simple brain teaser, barely more complicated than the well-known coin toss. I could solve it with pen and paper, but I wanted to squeeze out of it as much as I could.
My central thesis in this post is that, if we formulate our assumptions well, we can turn questions about probability into questions about data.
          
        
        </description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>